Safety Plan#

score-crates Safety Plan
status: draft
security: NO
safety: ASIL_B
version: 0
note:

The module safety plan shall be continuously maintained during the project. Deviations to the module safety plan should be documented here

Functional Safety Management Context#

This Safety Plan adds to the project’s wp__platform_safety_plan all the module development relevant work products needed for ISO 26262 conformity.

Functional Safety Management Scope#

This Safety Plan’s scope is a SW module of the SW platform - this moddule is a container for Rust libraries (crates). The module consists of one or more SW components and will be qualified as a SEooC.

Functional Safety Management Roles#

Table 1 Module roles#

Role

Assignee

Safety Manager

<link to Module’s Safety Manager assignment or name>

Module Project Manager

<link to Module’s Project Manager assignment or name>

Tailoring#

No addition to the tailoring in the SW platform project as defined in the project’s wp__platform_safety_plan.

Functional Safety Module Work products#

One set of work products for the module and one set for each component of the module:

Module Work products List#

Table 2 Module Work products#

Work product Id

Link to process

Process status

Link to WP

wp__module_safety_plan

gd_guidl__saf_plan_definitions

valid

this document

wp__module_safety_package

gd_guidl__saf_package

valid

this document (including the linked documentation)

wp__fdr_reports (module Safety Plan)

gd_chklst__safety_plan

valid

<Link to WP>

wp__fdr_reports (module Safety Package)

gd_chklst__safety_package

valid

<Link to WP>

wp__fdr_reports (module’s Safety Analyses & DFA)

gd_chklst__safety_analysis

valid

<Link to WP>

wp__audit_report

performed by external experts

n/a

<Link to WP>

wp__module_safety_manual

gd_temp__safety_manual

valid

<Link to WP>

wp__verification_module_ver_report

gd_temp__mod_ver_report

valid

score-crates Verification R... (doc__score_crates_verification_report)

wp__module_sw_release_note

gd_temp__rel_mod_rel_note

valid

<Link to WP>

Component Pastey Work products List#

Note: In case the component is a new development, wp__sw_component_class shall be removed from the above list (and also from the folders). In case an OSS element is used in the module, part 6 has to be filled out.

OSS (sub-)component qualification plan#

For the selected OSS component the following work products will be implemented (and why):

If the OSS element is classified as
  • component, then the below table shall match the above, adding the reasoning for tailoring of work products according to the OSS component classification.

  • lower level component, then no work products additional to the component’s will be planned and activities below are part of the component’s issues.

Table 4 OSS (sub-)component Pastey Work products#

Work product Id

Link to process

Reasoning for tailoring

wp__requirements_comp

gd_temp__req_comp_req

Always needed (for Q and QR classification) and also improves process Id 2

wp__requirements_comp_aou

gd_temp__req_aou_req

Always needed (for Q and QR classification) and also improves process Id 5

wp__requirements_inspect

gd_chklst__req_inspection

needed

wf__cr_mt_comparch

gd_temp__arch_comp

It is small crate structure with one public interface, architecture view showing this shall be provided.

wp__sw_component_fmea

gd_temp__comp_saf_fmea

Safety analysis will be performed.

wp__sw_arch_verification

gd_chklst__arch_inspection_checklist

Tailored - Not needed due to simplicity.

wp__sw_implementation

n/a

Tailored - If source code is modified, this is not a OSS qualification any more.

wp__verification_sw_unit_test

gd_guidl__verification_guide

Tailored - already provided by OSS component, see https://github.com/AS1100K/pastey/tree/master/pastey-test-suite

wp__sw_implementation_inspection

gd_chklst__impl_inspection_checklist

Tailored - OSS (design) documentation already exists, see https://docs.rs/pastey/0.2.3/pastey/

wp__verification_comp_int_test

gd_guidl__verification_guide

Always needed (for Q and QR classification)

wp__sw_component_class

gd_guidl__component_classification

Always needed as basis for tailoring.

Module Safety Package#

To create the safety package (according to gd_guidl__saf_package) the following documents and work products status have to go to “valid” (after the relevant verification were performed).

Module Documents Status#

For all the work product documents the status can be seen by following the “Link to WP”. A summary of the status is also documented in the project’s documentation management plan.

See <add here the section reference to the documentation management plan>

Component Documents Status#

For all the work product documents the status can be seen by following the “Link to WP”. A summary of the status is also documented in the project’s documentation management plan.

See <add here the section reference to the documentation management plan>

Component Requirements Status#

No needs passed the filters

Component AoU Status#

No needs passed the filters

Component Architecture Status#

No needs passed the filters

Deviations from Module Safety Plan#

The following deviations from the module safety plan are present in the module safety package. These are deviations from planned processes execution and/or workproduct results, safety anomalies in the sense of known bugs in the software are reported in the release notes.

<Describe here the deviations, whether they have an impact on module’s safety functions, how these can be mitigated or argued and if and when a resolution is planned.>