Checklist Quality Work Product Review#
Quality Work Product Review Checklist
|
status: valid
|
||||
Note
A lot of formal checks, defined in the process requirements, are implemented in the CI pipeline. So it’s checked for example that all needed attributes of a document are filled out. Additional checks are needed and focussed on the content of the work products. Therefore the provided checklists can be used.
General plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Acceptance criteria |
passed [yes | no] |
Remarks |
Issue link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PMP_00_00 |
Are the provided templates are used? |
Check folder templates / process description for available templates. Deviations need to have an approved argumentation by the CODEOWNER. |
||
PMP_00_01 |
Is the document up to date? |
Check with author if the document is still up to date. Consult also Github Issues for planned updates. |
||
PMP_00_02 |
If there were changes related to the last release is there are related planning available? |
Look for related issues (improvement, bugfix, task) in the issue tracking system. |
||
PMP_00_03 |
Is the status of the issues according to the document? |
Look in the status and also the history of the related issues. |
||
PMP_00_04 |
Are there any open issues related to the last release? |
Look description of last release. |
||
PMP_00_05 |
Are all documents have the status “valid”? |
Needed for every release. |
Project Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Acceptance criteria |
passed [yes | no] |
Remarks |
Issue link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP_00_01 |
Are the purpose and goals of the project defined (including references to related projects, if existing)? |
The purpose and goals should be clearly stated. |
||
PJP_00_02 |
Is the scope of the project defined? |
Also highly recommended is to define what is out of scope. |
||
PJP_00_04 |
Is the project life-cycle defined? |
The project life-cycle shall match to the purpose and goals of the project. |
||
PJP_00_05 |
Are major project metrics to track the progress described? |
Metrics shall be consistent to quality report. |
||
PJP_01_01 |
Are all for the project necessary roles assigned to team members? |
Check issue tracking system for assigned roles. Are there any issues that are not assigned? Are the assigned issues assigned to the right persons? |
||
PJP_01_02 |
Are skill needs and planned trainings documented/referenced? |
Check training plan and issue tracking system for related issues. |
||
PJP_02_01 |
Are the project milestones described/referenced? (And are they feasible?) |
Look on the planning boards in the issue tracking system. |
||
PJP_02_02 |
Are project activities defined, assigned and scheduled according to the defined project life cycle and estimations in a work breakdown structure? |
Check if activities matching to the project life cycle. |
||
PJP_02_03 |
Are project activities monitored and adjusted? |
Check if the status of the activities are up to date. |
||
PJP_02_04 |
Are the activities structured and of a manageable size? |
The project plans shall be structured as described in the project management plan. |
||
PJP_02_05 |
Is the technical infrastructure and resources needed described? |
Check if technical infrastructure and resources match to the project needs. |
||
PJP_03_01 |
Are communication interfaces between all involved parties defined (who communicates, what, in which intervals, over which channels, internal vs. Customer communication)? |
Check if communication interfaces are defined and followed. |
||
PJP_04_01 |
Have the reports for the project being defined? (Including required content, maintenance schedule etc.). |
Check if reports are defined and available. |
Safety Management plan review checklist templates#
Review Id |
Link to checklist |
|---|---|
SafMP_00_01 |
Security Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Link to checklist |
|---|---|
SecMP_00_01 |
Quality Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Acceptance criteria |
passed [yes | no] |
Remarks |
Issue link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QMP_00_01 |
Are the scope and goals defined (including references to related quality standards, internal regulations etc. if existing)? |
Are the quality objectives and scope aligned with the project’s standards and stakeholder requirements? |
||
QMP_00_02 |
Are work product quality goals defined? |
Check the definition and also if they are reachable. |
||
QMP_00_03 |
Are roles and responsibilities in the process area of quality management defined? |
Check if all needed roles are assigned to team members. |
||
QMP_01_01 |
Are quality goals and metrics for in the project specified, tracked and are they suitable for process improvement? |
Check if the defined metrics are measurable and suitable for process improvement. Check if there is a tracking done in the issue tracking system. |
||
QMP_01_02 |
Do all quality metrics have an acceptance criteria specified? |
Check if acceptance criteria are defined for all quality metrics. |
||
QMP_01_03 |
Is quality reporting described including cadence, relevant parties and documentation? |
Check if the quality reporting is following the defined cadence and if all relevant parties are involved. |
||
QMP_02_01 |
Are the quality milestones described or referenced in a quality Schedule, and are they feasible? |
Check the planning boards in the issue tracking system. |
||
QMP_03_01 |
Is the approach of conducting work product reviews defined and appropriate? |
Check if the work product reviews are following the defined process and if all relevant parties are involved. |
||
QMP_03_02 |
Is the approach of conducting process audits defined and appropriate? |
Check if the process audits are following the defined process and if all relevant parties are involved. |
||
QMP_04_01 |
Is the process of handling problems and/or non-conformances defined? |
Check if there is a defined process for handling problems and non-conformances. Check if there are related issues in the issue tracking system. |
||
QMP_04_02 |
Is there a specification on how to ensure the resolution of process non-conformances? |
Check if there are defined actions for resolving non-conformances and if they are tracked in the issue tracking system. |
||
QMP_04_03 |
Is there a specification on how to escalate process non-conformances in situations where goals of quality management conflict with those of other process areas? |
Check if there is a defined escalation process for non-conformances. |
||
QMP_04_04 |
Do the described mechanisms show that quality assurance has the independence and authority to escalate problems to appropriate levels of management? |
Check if the quality assurance has the independence and authority to escalate problems. This should be ensured by the project set up. |
||
QMP_05_01 |
Are process improvement activities planned, monitored, and documented? |
Check if there are planned process improvement activities and if they are tracked in the issue tracking system. Check if they are up to date and planned in a realistic way. |
Configuration Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Acceptance criteria |
passed [yes | no] |
Remarks |
Issue link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP_00_01 |
Are the objectives and scope defined? |
Check if the objectives and scope are clearly defined and understood by all relevant parties. |
||
CMP_00_02 |
Is the project lifecycle according to the configuration management plan? |
Check if the project lifecycle is followed as defined in the configuration management plan. |
||
CMP_00_03 |
Are retrievals(s) described? |
Check if the retrieval processes are clearly described and followed. |
||
CMP_00_04 |
Are the branches and baselines described? |
Check if the branching and baseline strategies are clearly defined and followed. |
||
CMP_00_05 |
Is the backup and recovery for the project described? |
Check if the backup and recovery procedures are clearly described and followed. |
||
CMP_00_06 |
Is the configuration management tooling (inclusive tool names and CI build tools) described? |
Check if the configuration management tools are clearly described and used as defined. |
Tool Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Link to checklist |
|---|---|
TMP_00_01 |
Release Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Acceptance criteria |
passed [yes | no] |
Remarks |
Issue link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RMP_00_01 |
Are release notes available for every release? |
Check if release notes are created for every release. Check if the template is used and the content is complete. |
Problem Resolution plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Link to checklist |
|---|---|
PMMP_00_01 |
Change Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Link to checklist |
|---|---|
ChMP_00_01 |
Change Request Review Check... (gd_chklst__change_cr_review) |
Software Verification plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Acceptance criteria |
passed [yes | no] |
Remarks |
Issue link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SWV_00_01 |
Are the objectives and scope defined? |
Check if the objectives and scope are clearly defined and understood by all relevant parties. |
||
SWV_00_02 |
Are the verification methods documented and up to date? |
Check if the verification methods are clearly described and followed. |
||
SWV_00_03 |
Are the test derivation methods documented and up to date? |
Check if the test derivation methods are clearly described and followed. |
||
SWV_00_04 |
Are the software quality criteria defined and documented? |
Check if the software quality criteria are clearly defined and understood by all relevant parties. Have a look on the reports to verify if the criteria are fulfilled. |
||
SWV_00_05 |
Are all used tools described? |
Check if all tools used for software verification are clearly described and used as defined. Are additional tools used that are not described? |
||
SWV_00_06 |
Are verification setups and variants described, documented and up to date? |
Check if the verification setups and variants are clearly described and followed. |
Documentation Management plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Link to checklist |
|---|---|
DMP_00_01 |
Documentation Review Checklist (gd_chklst__documentation_review) |
Software Development Plan review checklist template#
Review Id |
Acceptance criteria |
passed [yes | no] |
Remarks |
Issue link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SDP_00_01 |
Are the objectives and scope defined? |
Check if the objectives and scope are clearly defined and understood by all relevant parties. |
||
SDP_00_02 |
Are the design and programming languages defined? |
Check if the design and programming languages are clearly defined and suitable for the project. |
||
SDP_00_03 |
Are coding guidelines available, documented and up to date? |
Check if coding guidelines are followed and if they are up to date. |
||
SDP_00_04 |
Is a software configuration guideline available, documented and up to date? |
Check if the software configuration guideline is followed and if deviations have an approved argumentation by the CODEOWNER. |
||
SDP_00_05 |
Are all SW development tools described? |
Check if all tools used for software development are clearly described. If possible check if they are used as defined. |