Safety Analysis Checklist#

[Your Platform Name] Safety Analysis Checklist
status: draft
security: YES
safety: ASIL_B
tags: template
realizes: wp__fdr_reports
doc__platform_name_safety_analysis_fdr
Generic Document

Attention

The above directive must be updated according to your Platform.

  • Modify Your Platform Name to be your Platform Name

  • Modify id to be your Platform Name in lower snake case preceded by doc__ and followed by _safety _analysis_fdr

  • Adjust status to be valid

  • Adjust safety, security and tags according to your needs

Purpose The purpose of this Safety Analysis (DFA and FMEA) checklist template is to collect the topics to be checked during verification of the Safety Analysis.

Checklist

Table 77 Safety Analysis Checklist#

Review ID

Acceptance Criteria

Guidance

Passed

Remarks

Issue link

REQ_01_01

Is / are the attribute sufficient set correctly?

The mitigations shall have a direct influence ont the violation by prevention, detection or mitigation to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

The mitigations are sufficient.

<yes|no>

REQ_01_02

Are the templates for DFA and/or FMEA used?

See DFA Templates / FMEA Templates and also Safety Analysis Process Requirements

Templates are used to generate the DFA or / and FMEA.

<yes|no>

REQ_01_03

Were the failure initiators / fault models applied?

See DFA failure initiators (gd_guidl__dfa_failure_initiators) / FMEA Fault Models (gd_guidl__fault_models)

The applicable items of the failure initiators / fault models are used to ensure a structured analysis. For all not applicable items an argument shall be given in the content of the document.

<yes|no>

REQ_01_04

Are the failure effects clearly and completely described?

Use the generic failure effect descriptions and enlarge the description if it’s applicable to the considered element.

The effects of the failure is described completely. The effect can be recognized easily.

<yes|no>

REQ_01_06

Is the attribute “mitigated by” linked correct?

Check if the correct failure effect is linked via “mitigated by”.

The “mitigated by” link is correct.

<yes|no>

REQ_01_07

Is the sufficiency of the “mitigated by” (prevention, detection or mitigation) described or can it be recognized easily?

The sufficiency of the “mitigated by” is described in the content of the document. It can be recognized easily.

The “mitigated by” shows clearly that a fault / failure can be mitigated by the linked requirement by prevention, detection or mitigation. It shall be described in the contend.

<yes|no>

REQ_01_08

Is the overall result of the Safety Analysis described in the report?

It shall be shown in the report if the Safety Analysis are finished and if all artifacts are “valid” and “sufficient”.

The results of the Safety Analysis are described in the report. The report is available Platform Verification Report (wp__verification_platform_ver_report).

<yes|no>