6 Artifact & Distribution Infrastructure ⚪

Infrastructure managing released deliverables, versioning, publication, and consumer access across S-CORE.

⚠️ This chapter is written by ChatGPT and was not yet reviewed

S-CORE

  • GitHub Releases is the primary mechanism for publishing S-CORE deliverables.
  • S-CORE delivery can include source releases, prebuilt artifacts, container images, and associated release metadata.
  • Artifact versioning follows semantic versioning aligned with git tagging.
  • SBOM and provenance data should accompany released deliverables for compliance and traceability.
  • Biggest gap: artifact and delivery infrastructure is largely unstructured; there is no shared model for deliverable types, publication channels, retention, or consumer access across S-CORE.

6.1 Deliverable Types ⚪

Infrastructure defining which kinds of release deliverables S-CORE can publish and support.

S-CORE

  • S-CORE repositories may need to publish different deliverable types depending on consumer needs, including source archives, prebuilt packages, and container images.
  • The infrastructure should support describing, versioning, and publishing these deliverables consistently across repositories.
  • Biggest gap: no shared capability model defines which deliverable types exist in S-CORE, how they differ, or what infrastructure each type requires.

6.1.1 Source Deliverables

Delivery of source-based release artifacts intended for downstream build or inspection.

S-CORE

  • Source delivery can include tagged source archives and related release metadata published from version control.
  • GitHub Releases can act as a distribution point for source-based deliverables.
  • Biggest gap: no shared definition exists for which source deliverables are expected, how complete they must be, or which metadata must always accompany them.

6.1.2 Prebuilt Deliverables

Delivery of compiled or otherwise pre-generated artifacts for direct downstream consumption.

S-CORE

  • Prebuilt deliverables can include binaries, archives, packages, generated SDK assets, or other installable outputs attached to a release.
  • GitHub Releases currently provides the most obvious publication mechanism for such assets.
  • Biggest gap: no common publication pattern defines which prebuilt deliverables should be release-grade, how they are structured, or how consumers discover them.

6.1.3 Image Deliverables

Delivery of container or VM-style images intended for execution or integration environments.

S-CORE

  • Some S-CORE use cases may require deliverables in image form, such as container images for tooling, CI, or runtime integration.
  • Image-based delivery differs from archive-style release assets and usually requires registry-oriented publication and lifecycle handling.
  • Biggest gap: no image delivery channel, registry strategy, or publication standard is currently defined for S-CORE.

6.2 Distribution Channels ⚪

Infrastructure publishing release deliverables to downstream consumers through appropriate channels.

S-CORE

  • GitHub Releases is currently the primary public distribution channel for S-CORE deliverables.
  • Different deliverable types may require different channels, such as release assets, registries, or mirrored repositories.
  • Biggest gap: no shared distribution model maps deliverable types to supported publication channels and consumer access patterns.

6.2.1 Release Publishing

Publishing release deliverables through release-oriented channels such as GitHub Releases.

S-CORE

  • Release pipelines can publish deliverables as GitHub Releases and attach binaries, source bundles, checksums, SBOMs, and related files.
  • This channel is suitable for archive-style release deliverables and public release notes.
  • Biggest gap: release publication is not yet standardized across repositories, and release composition is not consistently defined.

6.2.2 Registry-Based Distribution

Publishing deliverables through registries such as package repositories or OCI registries.

S-CORE

  • Registry-based distribution would be the natural channel for package-oriented or image-oriented deliverables.
  • No shared package repository or OCI registry strategy is currently documented for S-CORE.
  • Biggest gap: there is no common registry-backed distribution capability for deliverables that are not well served by GitHub Releases alone.

6.3 Release Metadata ⚪

Infrastructure attaching the metadata required to identify, verify, and consume released deliverables.

S-CORE

  • Released deliverables should be accompanied by metadata such as version identifiers, checksums, SBOMs, provenance, and release notes.
  • Metadata is part of the delivery capability because downstream consumers need it to verify, integrate, and audit releases.
  • Biggest gap: no common release metadata baseline defines what every S-CORE release must publish.

6.3.1 Versioning & Tagging

Identifying deliverables consistently across repositories and releases.

S-CORE

  • Semantic versioning aligned with git tags is the expected standard across S-CORE repositories.
  • Versioning and tagging identify release deliverables and connect them back to source history.
  • Biggest gap: versioning conventions are not uniformly enforced or validated across repositories.

6.3.2 Compliance & Traceability Metadata

Publishing supporting metadata needed for compliance, verification, and supply-chain traceability.

S-CORE

  • SBOMs, provenance data, signatures, and checksums should accompany released deliverables where applicable.
  • This metadata supports compliance, traceability, and trust in downstream usage.
  • Biggest gap: no standardized process ensures that compliance and traceability metadata is generated and published with each release.

6.4 Consumer Access ⚪

Infrastructure making released deliverables discoverable, retrievable, and usable by downstream consumers.

S-CORE

  • Consumers need a clear path to discover available deliverables, understand their intended use, and retrieve the correct format.
  • Consumer access includes naming, discoverability, documentation, and availability of public download or pull mechanisms.
  • Biggest gap: no shared consumer-facing model explains where deliverables live, which consumers each format serves, or how access should work across S-CORE.

6.4.1 Discoverability

Making available deliverables and their purpose visible to downstream users.

S-CORE

  • GitHub Releases offers basic discoverability for release assets and notes.
  • Deliverable discoverability should also include documentation that explains what is published and how it is meant to be consumed.
  • Biggest gap: no consistent discoverability pattern helps consumers understand which release assets exist and which are relevant for their use case.

6.4.2 Retention & Availability

Keeping released deliverables accessible over time according to a defined lifecycle.

S-CORE

  • GitHub retains release artifacts indefinitely, while GitHub Actions artifacts are ephemeral and CI-scoped only.
  • Long-term consumer access depends on persistent publication channels rather than temporary pipeline storage.
  • Biggest gap: no explicit retention, mirroring, or availability policy is defined for S-CORE deliverables.