.. # ******************************************************************************* # Copyright (c) 2025 Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation # # See the NOTICE file(s) distributed with this work for additional # information regarding copyright ownership. # # This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the # terms of the Apache License Version 2.0 which is available at # https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 # ******************************************************************************* Safety Package Formal Review Report =================================== .. document:: Rust Base Libraries Safety Package Formal Review :id: doc__baselibs_rust_safety_package_fdr :status: draft :safety: ASIL_B :security: NO :realizes: wp__fdr_reports :tags: baselibs_rust **1. Purpose** The purpose of this review checklist is to report status of the formal review for the safety package. **2. Checklist** .. list-table:: Safety Package Checklist :header-rows: 1 * - Id - Safety package activity - Compliant to ISO 26262? - Comment * - 1 - Is a safety package provided which matches the safety plan (i.e. all planned work products referenced)? - [YES | NO ] - * - 2 - Is the argument how functional safety is achieved, provided in the safety package, plausible and sufficient? - NO - The argument is intentionally not provided by the project. * - 3 - Are the referenced work products available? - [YES | NO ] - * - 4 - Are the referenced work products in released state, including the process safety audit? - [YES | NO ] - * - 5 - If safety related deviations from the process or safety concept are documented, are these argued understandably? - [YES | NO ] -